{"id":5245,"date":"2013-02-13T12:15:32","date_gmt":"2013-02-13T17:15:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gadflyonline.com\/home\/?p=5245"},"modified":"2013-02-13T12:16:03","modified_gmt":"2013-02-13T17:16:03","slug":"executioner-in-chief-how-a-nobel-peace-prize-winner-became-the-head-of-a-worldwide-assassination-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/executioner-in-chief-how-a-nobel-peace-prize-winner-became-the-head-of-a-worldwide-assassination-program\/","title":{"rendered":"Executioner in Chief: How a Nobel Peace Prize Winner Became the Head of a Worldwide Assassination Program"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Executioner-in-Chief_585x585\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u201cMuch of our foreign policy now depends on the hope of benevolent dictators and philosopher kings. The law can\u2019t help. The law is what the kings say it is.\u201d\u2014Ta-Nehisi Coates, <\/em>writing for The Atlantic<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cIf George Bush had done this, it would have been stopped.\u201d\u2014Joe Scarborough, former Republican congressman and current MSNBC pundit<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

When Barack Obama ascended to the presidency in 2008, there was a sense, at least among those who voted for him, that the country might change for the better. Those who watched in awe as President Bush chipped away at our civil liberties over the course of his two terms as president thought that maybe this young, charismatic Senator from Illinois would reverse course and put an end to some of the Bush administration\u2019s worst transgressions\u2014the indefinite detention of suspected terrorists, the torture, the black site prisons, and the never-ending wars that have drained our resources, to name just a few.<\/p>\n

A few short years later, that fantasy has proven to be just that: a fantasy. Indeed, Barack Obama has not only carried on the Bush legacy, but has taken it to its logical conclusion. As president, Obama has gone beyond Guantanamo Bay, gone beyond spying on Americans\u2019 emails and phone calls, and gone beyond bombing countries without Congressional authorization. He now claims, as revealed in a leaked Department of Justice memo, the right to murder any American citizen the world over, so long as he has a feeling that they might<\/em>, at some point in the future, pose a threat to the United States.<\/p>\n

Let that sink in. The President of the United States of America believes he has the absolute right to kill you based upon secret \u201cevidence\u201d that you might be a terrorist. Not only does he think he can kill you, but he believes he has the right to do so in secret, without formally charging you of any crime and providing you with an opportunity to defend yourself in a court of law. To top it all off, the memo asserts that these decisions about whom to kill are not subject to any judicial review whatsoever.<\/p>\n

This is what one would call Mafia-style justice, when one powerful overlord\u2014in this case, the president\u2014gets to decide whether you live or die based solely on his own peculiar understanding of right and wrong. This is how far we have fallen in the twelve years since 9\/11, through our negligence and our failure to hold our leaders in both political parties accountable to the principles enshrined in the Constitution.<\/p>\n

According to the leaked Department of Justice memo, there are certain \u201cconditions\u201d under which it is acceptable for the president to kill a U.S. citizen without the basic trappings of American justice, i.e., a lawyer and a fair hearing before a neutral judge.<\/p>\n

First, you have to be suspected of being a \u201csenior operational leader\u201d of al-Qaeda or an \u201cassociated force.\u201d Of course, neither of these terms is defined. Making matters worse, the government doesn\u2019t actually have to prove <\/em>that you\u2019re an \u201coperational leader.\u201d It simply has to suspect <\/em>that you are. (Of course, if all it takes for the government to pull the trigger and kill a U.S. citizen is a hunch, then the rest of the conditions set out in the memo are moot.)<\/p>\n

Second, capturing you has to be \u201cinfeasible.\u201d Easy enough, since \u201cinfeasibility of capture\u201d includes being unable to capture someone without putting American troops in harm\u2019s way.<\/p>\n

Third, you must pose \u201can imminent threat of violent attack against the United States,\u201d whether or not you can actually execute an attack on our soil. Before you breathe a sigh of relief that perhaps your neck is safe now, keep in mind that the imminence requirement \u201cdoes not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future.\u201d The Bush administration should get some credit here, since it was their creative parsing of the \u201cimminent\u201d threat posed by Saddam Hussein and his so-called weapons of mass destruction that inspired the Obama lawyers to play footloose with the laws on killing American citizens.<\/p>\n

In short, by simply asserting that an American citizen is an enemy of the United States, the Obama administration has given itself the authority to murder that individual. This pales in comparison to George W. Bush\u2019s assertion that he could detain an American citizen indefinitely simply by labeling him an enemy combatant.<\/p>\n

Compounding this travesty, the Obama administration also insists that the power to target a U.S. citizen for murder applies to any \u201cinformed, high-level official of the U.S. government,\u201d not just the president. Therefore, any bureaucrat or politician, if appointed to a high enough position, can target an American for execution by way of drone strikes.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s been done before. Without proving that they were \u201csenior operational leaders\u201d of any terrorist organization, the Obama administration used drone strikes to assassinate Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, both American citizens.<\/p>\n

So now we find ourselves at this strange, surreal juncture where clear-cut definitions of right and wrong and the rule of law have been upended by legal parsing, government corruption, corporate greed, partisan games, and politicians with questionable morals and little-to-no loyalty to the American people.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a short skip and a jump from a scenario where the president authorizes drone strikes on American citizens abroad to one in which a high-level bureaucrat authorizes a drone strike on American citizens here in the United States. It\u2019s only a matter of time. Obama has already opened the door to drones flying in American skies\u2014an estimated 30,000 by 2015, and a $30 billion per year industry to boot.<\/p>\n

Yet no matter how much legislation we pass to protect ourselves from these aerial threats being used against us domestically, either to monitor our activities or force us into compliance, as long as the president is allowed to unilaterally determine who is a threat and who deserves to die by way of a drone strike, we are all in danger.<\/p>\n

This is surely the beginning of the end of the republic. Not only are we upending the rule of law, but killing people across the globe without accountability seriously undermines America\u2019s long term relationships with other nations. The use of drones to kill American citizens demonstrates just how out of control the so-called \u201cwar on terror\u201d has become. A war that by definition cannot be won has expanded to encompass the entire globe. This confirms the fears of those who have been watching as the American drone program has slowly expanded from targeting members of al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan to include any person the president cares to see eliminated, not to mention the countless civilians killed along the way.<\/p>\n

Retired general Stanley McChrystal has said that drone strikes are \u201chated on a visceral level\u201d and feed into a \u201cperception of American arrogance.\u201d By attacking small time jihadists, as well as innocent civilians, the American government further inflames populations where terrorist groups are embedded, exciting anti-American sentiment among those who may have previously been an asset to America\u2019s relationship with Muslim countries. In fact, McChrystal and former CIA director Michael Hayden have both expressed concern that American drone strikes are \u201ctargeting low-level militants who do not pose a direct threat to the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n

For example, Salem Ahmed bin Ali Jaber, a Muslim cleric in Yemen gave a long sermon in August 2012 denouncing Al-Qaeda. A few days later, three members of Al-Qaeda showed up to his neighborhood, saying they wanted to talk with Jaber. Jaber agreed, bringing along his cousin Waleed Abdullah, a police officer, for protection. In the middle of the conversation, a hail of American missiles rained down upon the men, killing them all.<\/p>\n

Incidents such as these are the exact reason that America cannot seem to bring an end to its myriad military commitments abroad.\u00a0 By undermining our potential allies, we simply further endanger American lives. According to Naji al Zaydi, an opponent of Al-Qaeda and former governor of Marib province in Yemen, \u201csome of these young guys getting killed have just been recruited and barely known what terrorism means.\u201d In direct opposition to the stated goal of the \u201cwar on terror,\u201d we are creating enemies abroad who will gladly look forward to the day when the United States falls in on itself, like the Roman Empire before it.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, there seems to be no exit from this situation. Too many high-level officials, both Democrats and Republicans, either don\u2019t care, or actively champion the murder of American citizens and innocent civilians alike by the president. As journalist Amy Goodman put it, \u201cthe recent excesses of U.S. presidential power are not transient aberrations, but the creation of a frightening new normal, where drone strikes, warrantless surveillance, assassination and indefinite detention are conducted with arrogance and impunity, shielded by secrecy and beyond the reach of law.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When Barack Obama ascended to the presidency in 2008, there was a sense, at least among those who voted for him, that the country might change for the better. Those who watched in awe as President Bush chipped away at our civil liberties over the course of his two terms as president thought that maybe this young, charismatic Senator from Illinois would reverse course and put an end to some of the Bush administration\u2019s worst transgressions\u2014the indefinite detention of suspected terrorists, the torture, the black site prisons, and the never-ending wars that have drained our resources, to name just a few.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":5246,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[214,217,212],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5245"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5245"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5245\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5250,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5245\/revisions\/5250"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gadflyonline.com\/home\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}